2 of 3
2
JINDAL VETOS GAMBLING EXPANSION…
Posted: 03 July 2008 09:03 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 16 ]
Regular Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  487
Joined  2003-10-07
bottom line - 02 July 2008 05:42 PM

good for him...we’ve seen the pie in the sky gambling promised...when all is said and done...gambling has not helped education in La.

it’s a form of taxation on poor people

It is not a tax on poor people no one forces them to Gamble.

 Signature 

"One thing is for sure, I will not bail them out on this and do their job for them. I will not veto this as it is very clear to everyone that the result would be a grinding halt to the tremendous reforms and progress our state is making. I will give them no excuse to stop doing the people’s business, and I will not allow the momentum of our state to stop over this or anything else."--Bobby Jindal

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 10:23 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 17 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  824
Joined  2007-09-12
Bobby Jindal - 02 July 2008 06:01 PM

The Iberville racetrack gambling was opposed by the casinos.  This is the Abramoff-Fletcher shuffle ... Bottom is right about the poor people; the ones who get rich are the lobbyists.  Right hand pushes for racetracks while left hand raises casino and indian money to fight the right hand.  Mercy me.

I think that Jindal was 100% right on this one.  (I hope bottom line’s head doesn’t explode when he reads this.)

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 11:10 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 18 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1662
Joined  2006-01-31

Thanks , Coach.. You, like I, admit the good in others

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 July 2008 08:41 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 19 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8995
Joined  2005-10-19
BuyUpolitics - 03 July 2008 09:03 AM

bottom line - 02 July 2008 05:42 PM
good for him...we’ve seen the pie in the sky gambling promised...when all is said and done...gambling has not helped education in La.

it’s a form of taxation on poor people

It is not a tax on poor people no one forces them to Gamble.

Not it’s not a tax on the poor. It’s a tax on the taxpaying public that has to come up with more to help those who gamble everything away.

Gambling Oh I mean Gaming is not a business that creates anything. It is a drain on areas that don’t bring tourists in to gamble.

 Signature 

If you are part of a society that votes, then do so. There may be no candidates and no measures you want to vote for . . but there are certain to be ones you want to vote against. In case of doubt, vote against. By this rule you will rarely go wrong. - Robert Heinlein

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 July 2008 11:59 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 20 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1662
Joined  2006-01-31

Go in the casinos and you see a few hill-rollers and thousands of people dreesly poorly,front teeth missing,etc..look around next time to observe…

the poor get their S.S. check,unemployment/low wages check and they blow it often thinking they’re going to win big...many are poor and uneducated..

it sometimes becomes an addicition they don’t know THE RULES ALWAYS FAVOR THE HOUSE or they would not be in business

I actually heard a guy in Harrah’s cussing as he walked out door..."there goes my child support money..F.... !!”

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 July 2008 01:54 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 21 ]
Regular Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  355
Joined  2003-11-10

I think they should open it up and have as businesses as the market can handle.  Like any other industry, the market should decide who survives.

Noone is forced to spend there money in there. I don’t buy lotto or powerball tickets.  I pass casinos every day and I don’t stop. I have just visited my first casino almost a year ago and was bored silly.  Anyone who spends their child support money or bill money should have their utilites turn off or be in jail for lack of support.

 Signature 

Life Isn’t About Waiting For The Storm To Pass. It’s About Learning How To Dance In The Rain.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 July 2008 03:48 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 22 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5946
Joined  2007-07-26

It is simply protectionism of existing gaming.

Louisiana should do like Mississippi on gambling and quit these hypocritical acts of limiting gambling on moral grounds. There should be no limit on the licenses and individual cities and parishes should be allowed to decide if they want it or not. It works in Mississippi.

It is like the dry counties in parts of the South where the bootleggers and preachers are reluctant allies to keep lawful alcohol out of the county.

 Signature 

“How small of all that human hearts endure / That part which laws or kings can cause or cure.” Samuel Johnson

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 July 2008 04:11 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 23 ]
Regular Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  157
Joined  2008-06-29
ccrider - 03 July 2008 08:48 AM

Leon Trotsky - 02 July 2008 09:41 PM
fred - 02 July 2008 06:22 PM
Lev is concerned only about the party… A narrow viewpoint indeed.

I am concerned about the state of the Republican Party today.  Intellectually bankrupt, purveyors of failed policies, harbingers of doom and gloom if they are not elected, zenophobia.

Right on. Look at what Bush Cheney have done and we’re likely seeing what Jindal and his crew want to do.
Consider the spending that may prove to bankrupt the government down the line.

A failed energy policy.

An economic plan that has cost millions of jobs and could cause millions to lose their homes.

A foreign policy that has us bogged down in a country that did not attack us and unable to fight in one where the attack originated.

Almost total loss of confidence by consumers.

A dollar so weak it’s driving up the cost of gasoline to record prices.

Bush Cheney’s economic policy can be measured by comparing the price of gasoline when they took office and the price today. Bush Cheney and their friends are making millions while consumers are facing economic failure.

I am a conservative and was a Republican except for both Bush’s reelections.

CC, is the failed energy plan about not being able to drill on our on soil?  If so, that was Clinton that put it into law and congress is blocking the issue.

 Signature 

"Public offices were not made for private convenience.” --Thomas Jefferson

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 July 2008 04:13 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 24 ]
Regular Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  157
Joined  2008-06-29

Ditto on the gambling has not helped education, at least not anyplace I have seen.

 Signature 

"Public offices were not made for private convenience.” --Thomas Jefferson

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 July 2008 09:54 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 25 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  595
Joined  2007-04-22
bottom line - 02 July 2008 05:42 PM

good for him...we’ve seen the pie in the sky gambling promised...when all is said and done...gambling has not helped education in La.

it’s a form of taxation on poor people

Good for Jindal. Now if we can start getting some rollbacks of existing gambling instead of merely “opposing its expansion” I would be thrilled.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 July 2008 01:52 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 26 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5946
Joined  2007-07-26
Bob Odom - 05 July 2008 09:54 AM

bottom line - 02 July 2008 05:42 PM
good for him...we’ve seen the pie in the sky gambling promised...when all is said and done...gambling has not helped education in La.

it’s a form of taxation on poor people

Good for Jindal. Now if we can start getting some rollbacks of existing gambling instead of merely “opposing its expansion” I would be thrilled.

He is not going to do that. They are politically too powerful. He will parade restrictions of gambling out there touting his stands as anti gambling but the reality is he is merely protecting existing gambling from competition. He couldn’t roll back gambling in Shreveport if he wanted too. It would be political suicide.

 Signature 

“How small of all that human hearts endure / That part which laws or kings can cause or cure.” Samuel Johnson

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 July 2008 02:34 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 27 ]
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3160
Joined  2003-10-08

HB 937 provided for a public referendum on the issue of slot machines in a live horse-racing facility.  It would have given the people in the area an opportunity to decide that issue for themselves, but it was vetoed.

I thought conservatives liked public referendums.  Not with this?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 July 2008 05:53 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 28 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  22991
Joined  2004-10-21

The gambling industry is a parasite on society. It does more harm than good.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 July 2008 06:20 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 29 ]
Regular Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  487
Joined  2003-10-07
Trollfessor - 05 July 2008 02:34 PM

HB 937 provided for a public referendum on the issue of slot machines in a live horse-racing facility.  It would have given the people in the area an opportunity to decide that issue for themselves, but it was vetoed.

I thought conservatives liked public referendums.  Not with this?

They are for smaller government until it deals with the what they want you to believe.

 Signature 

"One thing is for sure, I will not bail them out on this and do their job for them. I will not veto this as it is very clear to everyone that the result would be a grinding halt to the tremendous reforms and progress our state is making. I will give them no excuse to stop doing the people’s business, and I will not allow the momentum of our state to stop over this or anything else."--Bobby Jindal

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 July 2008 08:29 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 30 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5946
Joined  2007-07-26

I wonder if Jindal would sign a bill outlawing bingo at the Knights of Columbus???

 Signature 

“How small of all that human hearts endure / That part which laws or kings can cause or cure.” Samuel Johnson

Profile
 
 
   
2 of 3
2