bottom line - 03 July 2008 11:09 PM

bottom line - 03 July 2008 09:44 AM

bottom line - 03 July 2008 09:02 AM

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHA.....too funny....I’m glad to see you trust the word of Democrat Pork Chop Annie(Ann D.)

over the word of our good Gov.....hhahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahaha......lol....hhahahahahhahahahahahahah

hahhahahhaha....ROFLOL.....hahhahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahah


Jindal has now body slammed the greedy_____-----NO PAY RAISES TILL 2012.....HEHHEHEHEHEH...SERVES THEM RIGHT FOR TRYING TO EXTORT THE GOOD gOV. IN RETURN FOR REFORMS....

no pay raises till 2012
4-5 new companies in just 6 months(more than Blanco’s whole term)
On ethics reform list we’ve moved from 48 to in top 10 as to what we demand ethically on our Leg.’s(sure, would have liked more--but it is a start)
!00’s who were EWE/Blanco/Foster hacks who had privarte contracts from serving on boards are forced to resign OR reveal their And profit from being on these boards.
I know you don’t agree with 6 tax cuts in 6 months...so let’s just say 4
Stelly is on way out--not as quick as I hoped ...but at least process is started...look for ir to be sped up in next 1-2 yrs.

some of you Jindal haters SEEM TO RESORT TO RACISM when the facts come out....
I could go on and on...late for work
BUT IT MAKES NO SENSE TO LIST THEM--YOU’LL DENY AND SPIN THAT IT WASN’T REFORM,or SO ONE ELSE ACTUALLY AUTORED THE BILL,ETC.
75% of you hated him and voted for Bozo,Georges,etc. anyway...why try to convice you??????.

I NEVER expected the pol.’s and pol. hacks who frequent this board to like him,, BUT THE PEOPLE DO !! He is now weathered the storm and he never dropped below 55% approval rating and now he’ll soon climb back into 65-70"s....

WHO CARES ? La. is moving forward --with hiccups here and there--BUT it HAS started , my good Dem. and malcontent friends...!!!!

So you’re afraid to discuss Jindal’s “reforms” because someone might spin that it wasn’t reform?????  That’s weak bottom line, very weak.  If you are just going come here and give us the “WOODY WINS!!!!” treatment for Jindal and then refuse to discuss specifics you might as well quit posting.  Personally, I think the reason you run from answering specifics is that you can’t do it.

And for the record, I did vote for Jindal and that’s why I’m outraged---he has REFUSED to listen to the voices of those of us who elected him.

See with you and I.B. it’s always lose/lose...no matter what a pro-JIndal person says--they’re wrong-you’re wrong

I list a few specifics above and instead of refuting (ex.--they’re not real companies-they’re shell companies Jindal paid to move here..lol)---

you say he doesn’t give us any…

WWHHHHAAAAAAA...WWWWHHHHAAAAA....did you bring cheese with all your whining???

PLus...some of you guys must have easy jobs/unemployed....I try to find time to come here once or twice a day for a few minutes...some times go several days in a row not coming here..don’t have time to argue point by point for hours...ESPECAILLY WHEN YOU HATE JINDAL SO MUCH ...YOU WILL NEVER ADMIT TO ANYTHING GOOD HE HAS DONE…

bottom line - 04 July 2008 11:52 AM

See with you and I.B. it’s always lose/lose...no matter what a pro-JIndal person says--they’re wrong-you’re wrong

I list a few specifics above and instead of refuting (ex.--they’re not real companies-they’re shell companies Jindal paid to move here..lol)---

you say he doesn’t give us any…


WWHHHHAAAAAAA...WWWWHHHHAAAAA....did you bring cheese with all your whining???

PLus...some of you guys must have easy jobs/unemployed....I try to find time to come here once or twice a day for a few minutes...some times go several days in a row not coming here..don’t have time to argue point by point for hours...ESPECAILLY WHEN YOU HATE JINDAL SO MUCH ...YOU WILL NEVER ADMIT TO ANYTHING GOOD HE HAS DONE…

You are a fool Bottom---it is your belief that no new companies established during the Blanco administration??? That Jindal actually moved four companies here???

The only thing a governor can claim credit for is the companies they bribe to move here that would have not come otherwise and they should be embarrassed to have bribed them. There is no moral goodness to give a company, Albamarle for example, tax money to bribe them to come here while taxing all the domestic companies.

If you are keeping score let me remind you the Marathon refinery expansion represented a bigger investment than all you care to attribute to Jindal put together.

Surely you are not so naive to suggest that this all Jindal did and that it is reform? What kind of socialist are you?

bottom line - 04 July 2008 11:52 AM

See with you and I.B. it’s always lose/lose...no matter what a pro-JIndal person says--they’re wrong-you’re wrong

I list a few specifics above and instead of refuting (ex.--they’re not real companies-they’re shell companies Jindal paid to move here..lol) you say he doesn’t give us any…

WWHHHHAAAAAAA...WWWWHHHHAAAAA....did you bring cheese with all your whining???

Well bottom line, I see you’re up to your old trick of trying to divert attention away from your failure to provide any factual backup to your non-stop BS by going on the attack. 

For the record, you didn’t list ANY specifics, which is why I had to ask you for some follow up.

As for the companies you claim Jindal brought to Louisiana, I merely asked you to list them and tell us why Jindal deserves credit for their moving here and also asked you to tell us how much money the Jindal administration gave them to move here. 

Same thing with the tax cuts.  You keep saying that he has given the people of Louisiana either 4 or 6 tax cuts since taking office, and I would simply like for you to list them.

For some reason every single time that some one ask you to back up your incessant spinning with some facts, you go on the offensive and attack them. 

Why is that, bottom line?  Do you not have answers to the simple questions I keep asking?  Are you simply repeating the spin you’ve heard from others and not bothering to find out if there’s any factual support?  Why do you get so pisssed off when I ask questions, and why do you obviously resent it so much when people want to know more than what this administration is spoon feeding us?  Should we just accept your poorly written spin at face value just because some twenty-something party hack posted it on politicsla.com? 

Why don’t you go back to you “WOODY WINS!!!!!” approach to posting.  At least then you were the board bafoon and everyone could at least laugh at you.