The only question I have is why do we have to bring a politician to the brink of destruction to make them do the right thing? When they compromise their intregrity it is over for them. The accusations are flying both ways now. He lied she lied. These are supposed to be adults, responsible people. Heck they’re making laws that affect our lives. I liked the SMOR poll however they should ad one more grade to each category, Put right below poor, it should be called pitiful. That’s the only adjective which can truly describe the antics of this legislative session and the last six months for that matter. If the Governor offers you Kool-Aid, please don’t drink it.
If this was prior to veto...he’s back cruising in 70’s....I talked to several who said they were waiting to see if he vetoed....
Blanco after 6 months seldom reached much over 50% and worse after Katrina.
I think coach Blanco,I.B. and Maurepas started dancing on Jindal political grave a little early !....hehhhheheheheheheh
i think your having your wet dream over his resurgence a bit too soon. jindal came off as an average politician in all of this, but even worse he appears to be running for yet another office just barely 6 mos into his term and his “"reforms’ have turned out to either be cheap coopting of others ideas or toothless set of “gold standard” laws not worth the paper they are printed on.
Nasty...he never went below 50%..55%-56% is considered good for a sitting Gov.
You all are dancing on his grave too soon....
National Review, Rush, Sadow,etc. are praising Jindal for the veto.....so go figure....he’s not toast like some of you have been saying since the day after he was sworn in !! Sure, It’s never smooth sailing for any Gov....Rush said Jindal took his time and listened to the people and did the courgeous thing even if it p.o. greedy Leg.’s
Nasty...he never went below 50%..55%-56% is considered good for a sitting Gov.
You all are dancing on his grave too soon....
National Review, Rush, Sadow,etc. are praising Jindal for the veto.....so go figure....he’s not toast like some of you have been saying since the day after he was sworn in !! Sure, It’s never smooth sailing for any Gov....Rush said Jindal took his time and listened to the people and did the courgeous thing even if it p.o. greedy Leg.’s
bottom line, the bottom line is: if jindal had to “take time” to listen to the people regarding the veto of this payraise, a payraise which he campaigned against and we all thought he was against before he even took office, he is hardly corageous, although im not surprised the republican spinmakers at the national review, the blowhard republican radio host, and the half academic, republican sadow would go out of their way to paint him as such. his integrity took a big hit with the way hes been handling things from the moment he took office to the moment he vetoed the payraise. ordinary folk arent going to come around to him like the repubs like you, rush, national review, and sadow are.....
Nasty...he never went below 50%..55%-56% is considered good for a sitting Gov.
You all are dancing on his grave too soon....
National Review, Rush, Sadow,etc. are praising Jindal for the veto.....so go figure....he’s not toast like some of you have been saying since the day after he was sworn in !! Sure, It’s never smooth sailing for any Gov....Rush said Jindal took his time and listened to the people and did the courgeous thing even if it p.o. greedy Leg.’s
Well I never said he would not be re-elected. Contary I said with all the tax money he has to spend it will be hard to beat him.
I have said for a long time now he is no fiscal conservative and neither are you Bottom. You have no principles or ideological beliefs you simply worship men like Jindal and Jenkins until they fail.
The only real reform we will get out of him is a bunch of spending and whatever it buys and the reform of his resume.
MR. KNOW-IT-ALL I.B.---you have once again pre-judged and talked about stuff you don’t know.
I was considering not voting for Jindal next time IF he failed to veto--thats certainly not what I would call blind worship
and I still like Woody, but the reality is he can’t win in 6th with big Obama turn-out(in my opinion-could be wrong)
See how you twist comments to say what you interpret others are saying...often you are wrong and who wants to stay up all night arguing with an OCD person who could have TRUTH staring them in the face and say “Oh, well, Jindal,etc. really meant this...I know the TRUTH...you and others don’t”. ??????…
You remind me of a hard core right wing religious right dude...who proclaims he has the corner on truth and others can go to hell !
WHO ARE YOU ? GOD or the all knowing psychic who can read other’s motives and mind.
WHO have you said good stuff about --other than Scalise?? trust me-he’ll do or say something you don’t like and you’ll throw him under train soon,too.
Nasty...he never went below 50%..55%-56% is considered good for a sitting Gov.
You all are dancing on his grave too soon....
National Review, Rush, Sadow,etc. are praising Jindal for the veto.....so go figure....he’s not toast like some of you have been saying since the day after he was sworn in !! Sure, It’s never smooth sailing for any Gov....Rush said Jindal took his time and listened to the people and did the courgeous thing even if it p.o. greedy Leg.’s
I have said for a long time now he is no fiscal conservative and neither are you Bottom. You have no principles or ideological beliefs you simply worship men like Jindal and Jenkins until they fail.
You know, I don’t know bottom very well so I can’t pass judgment on him. But I.B. you hit the nail on the head with regard to other republican activists. I’m a conservative first, and a republican second. I have a core set of ideological beliefs, and if my fellow Repubs fail to live up to my expectations you better believe I’m going to call them out on it. But it seems like a good chunk of Repubs online are more loyal to their candidates rather than their principles. It just pained me to see so many folks on national repub sites leap to Jindal’s defense during his pay raise march to death.
I just said I would have considered not voting for him IF he did not veto...is that core beliefs enough for you?
Rush is bragging on Jindal today ..I think that’s Rush’s problem ,too---no ideological,core beliefs ....hehhehehehh......
Ok you are against legelisators raises that would have cost the state $3 million.
Are you against:
-$1 billion in increased state spending attributed to increases in socialized medicine and public education that was spent by Jindal
-$300 million put into a slush fund for economic development considering the biggest economic development thus far has been $6 million to his wife’s former employer to move 30 people to town
-making our economic development director the highest paid director in the USA
-opposing reforming Stelly tax cuts
-opposing abolishing the state income state
-increases in the state payroll of $70 million per year
Nasty...he never went below 50%..55%-56% is considered good for a sitting Gov.
You all are dancing on his grave too soon....
National Review, Rush, Sadow,etc. are praising Jindal for the veto.....so go figure....he’s not toast like some of you have been saying since the day after he was sworn in !! Sure, It’s never smooth sailing for any Gov....Rush said Jindal took his time and listened to the people and did the courgeous thing even if it p.o. greedy Leg.’s
bottom line, the bottom line is: if jindal had to “take time” to listen to the people regarding the veto of this payraise, a payraise which he campaigned against and we all thought he was against before he even took office, he is hardly corageous, although im not surprised the republican spinmakers at the national review, the blowhard republican radio host, and the half academic, republican sadow would go out of their way to paint him as such. his integrity took a big hit with the way hes been handling things from the moment he took office to the moment he vetoed the payraise. ordinary folk arent going to come around to him like the repubs like you, rush, national review, and sadow are.....
