1 of 2
1
Vitter to seek help with fees
Posted: 03 July 2008 09:26 AM   [ Ignore ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2444
Joined  2008-04-20

Poor Vitter wants to use his campaign funds to pay for 137,177 in legal fees to cover his getting caught with his hooker. Some of the fee`s were to pay for advice
on how to handle this case and address it publicly.
Jindal and Vitter are really changing the image of louisiana.

WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. David Vitter will ask the Federal Election Commission today whether he can use campaign funds to pay for the $he incurred from his involvement in the case of a woman convicted of running a high-priced Washington prostitution ring.

The Louisiana Republican acknowledged in July 2007 that his phone number appeared on the client list of the woman dubbed “the D.C. Madam.” Deborah Jeane Palfrey was convicted in federal court in April of money laundering, mail fraud and conspiracy.

In a letter to the FEC, an attorney for Vitter says his client incurred the legal expenses in monitoring the Palfrey trial and quashing the subpoenas issued to him.

Vitter also had to hire attorneys to defend himself to the Senate Ethics Committee because of a complaint filed by the government watchdog group Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. The complaint was dismissed by the committee, which noted that Vitter was not charged with a crime and the incidents occurred when he was a House member.

The legal fees also cover the advice Vitter received on how to manage the case and address it publicly, wrote his attorney, Jan Witold Baran.

http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/politics/22850554.html

 Signature 

McCain , The bad economy is just your imagination. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivroxPyG-IE&feature;=related

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 09:32 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Regular Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  91
Joined  2008-06-17

If I had donated to his campaign I’d ask for my money back. Those folks gave him money to help him get elected, not pay his legal fees for getting caught with a hooker.

 Signature 

http://www.theoldriverroad.com

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 09:43 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2444
Joined  2008-04-20

It almost like he is trying to rub the people`s nose in this one.  Look what I got away with and you are even going to help me pay for it.

 Signature 

McCain , The bad economy is just your imagination. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivroxPyG-IE&feature;=related

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 11:15 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6069
Joined  2007-07-26

Scalise for Senate
Strain for Governor???

 Signature 

“How small of all that human hearts endure / That part which laws or kings can cause or cure.” Samuel Johnson

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 11:30 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1642
Joined  2007-08-27

Funny Piyush lies big public outcry

Vitter lies about hooker and uhmmmmmm nothing

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 11:33 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7425
Joined  2006-09-21
FormerLa - 03 July 2008 11:30 AM

Funny Piyush lies big public outcry

Vitter lies about hooker and uhmmmmmm nothing

There are some differences, but the attempt to use campaign funds for hooker defense does signal that some strong “situation ethics” rationalization is at work somewhere in the corridors of Vitter’s thought system.

 Signature 

Nope.  Don’t even think it.  Not the governor.  He has a job to do (God bless him and help keep him focused on governing and not on imposing his personal religious interpretations on the rest of us) while I’m just a moderate gadfly ... which in Louisiana they call “liberal.” --Faux Bobby Jindal

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 11:45 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
New Member
Rank
Total Posts:  5
Joined  2006-11-29

Is this the same David Vitter who ran for office as a strong advocate of family values?  If so, I would like my contribution returned.  I’m becoming real disillusioned with the Vitter Craig wing of the Republican Party.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 11:47 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2129
Joined  2007-08-17

Anyone of the rightwingers here going to contribute?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 12:28 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  23418
Joined  2004-10-21

Since you consider me the epitome of a right winger, I’ll contribute.. Under no circumstances should he be able to use campaign contributions to pay his lawyer bills.  Just my opinion.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 12:38 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2129
Joined  2007-08-17
fred - 03 July 2008 12:28 PM

Since you consider me the epitome of a right winger, I’ll contribute.. Under no circumstances should he be able to use campaign contributions to pay his lawyer bills.  Just my opinion.

I meant contribute to the fund paying his legal fees.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 12:43 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  23418
Joined  2004-10-21

Well, if anyone wants to contribute to him for his legal fees, that’s a personal issue.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 12:48 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]
Regular Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  157
Joined  2008-06-29
DM1 - 03 July 2008 09:26 AM

Poor Vitter wants to use his campaign funds to pay for 137,177 in legal fees to cover his getting caught with his hooker. Some of the fee`s were to pay for advice
on how to handle this case and address it publicly.
Jindal and Vitter are really changing the image of louisiana.





WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. David Vitter will ask the Federal Election Commission today whether he can use campaign funds to pay for the $he incurred from his involvement in the case of a woman convicted of running a high-priced Washington prostitution ring.

The Louisiana Republican acknowledged in July 2007 that his phone number appeared on the client list of the woman dubbed “the D.C. Madam.” Deborah Jeane Palfrey was convicted in federal court in April of money laundering, mail fraud and conspiracy.

In a letter to the FEC, an attorney for Vitter says his client incurred the legal expenses in monitoring the Palfrey trial and quashing the subpoenas issued to him.

Vitter also had to hire attorneys to defend himself to the Senate Ethics Committee because of a complaint filed by the government watchdog group Citizens For Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. The complaint was dismissed by the committee, which noted that Vitter was not charged with a crime and the incidents occurred when he was a House member.

The legal fees also cover the advice Vitter received on how to manage the case and address it publicly, wrote his attorney, Jan Witold Baran.

http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/politics/22850554.html

More insanity here.  But he wont get my vote again.  I can’t wait for the press release saying he was with the DC madam to get political support.

 Signature 

"Public offices were not made for private convenience.” --Thomas Jefferson

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 12:51 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]
Regular Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  157
Joined  2008-06-29
DM1 - 03 July 2008 09:43 AM

It almost like he is trying to rub the people`s nose in this one.  Look what I got away with and you are even going to help me pay for it.

That’s my intake of it.  Apparently he did not get the memo about what is going on with the people of his state.  This is another article already clipped and put in his opponent’s campaign ad folder.

 Signature 

"Public offices were not made for private convenience.” --Thomas Jefferson

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 12:54 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 13 ]
Regular Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  157
Joined  2008-06-29
Charlie Buras - 03 July 2008 09:32 AM

If I had donated to his campaign I’d ask for my money back. Those folks gave him money to help him get elected, not pay his legal fees for getting caught with a hooker.

He does not get it.  Guess he thinks he is smarter than the citizens that sent him there.  He apparently is suffering from that foot in mouth disease that is effecting other politicians.

 Signature 

"Public offices were not made for private convenience.” --Thomas Jefferson

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 12:56 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 14 ]
Regular Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  157
Joined  2008-06-29
teecee - 03 July 2008 11:45 AM

Is this the same David Vitter who ran for office as a strong advocate of family values?  If so, I would like my contribution returned.  I’m becoming real disillusioned with the Vitter Craig wing of the Republican Party.

Me too.  Mr Conservative Family Values, should pay his own legal fees.

 Signature 

"Public offices were not made for private convenience.” --Thomas Jefferson

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 12:57 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 15 ]
Regular Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  157
Joined  2008-06-29
Bobby Jindal - 03 July 2008 11:33 AM

FormerLa - 03 July 2008 11:30 AM
Funny Piyush lies big public outcry

Vitter lies about hooker and uhmmmmmm nothing

There are some differences, but the attempt to use campaign funds for hooker defense does signal that some strong “situation ethics” rationalization is at work somewhere in the corridors of Vitter’s thought system.

Well said Gov.

 Signature 

"Public offices were not made for private convenience.” --Thomas Jefferson

Profile
 
 
   
1 of 2
1