The Roman Catholic church to which Jindal and many legislators belong says evolution is what should be taught
Posted: 03 July 2008 01:09 PM   [ Ignore ]
Regular Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  64
Joined  2008-07-01

Any Louisianian who wants his kids to have a religious education can send them to parochial schools; although if the parochial school is Roman Catholic, the kids will learn standard biology ("Darwinism") in science classes, since the RC Church — Gov. Jindal’s church — approves it. Or they can home school them. Everybody’s fine with this. I’m fine with it. Louisiana Coalition for Science is fine with it. Raise you kids the way you want to. You may not, though — you constitutionally may not oblige taxpayers to fund your religious beliefs.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjM2ODY1N2E1NGZkYTJiNDEyYWMyMWQzYTQzYWYxODU

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 01:13 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  559
Joined  2007-11-09
ccrider - 03 July 2008 01:09 PM

Any Louisianian who wants his kids to have a religious education can send them to parochial schools; although if the parochial school is Roman Catholic, the kids will learn standard biology ("Darwinism") in science classes, since the RC Church — Gov. Jindal’s church — approves it. Or they can home school them. Everybody’s fine with this. I’m fine with it. Louisiana Coalition for Science is fine with it. Raise you kids the way you want to. You may not, though — you constitutionally may not oblige taxpayers to fund your religious beliefs.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjM2ODY1N2E1NGZkYTJiNDEyYWMyMWQzYTQzYWYxODU

No one is funding their religious beliefs, they are merely allowing the entire story to be taught. What, are you concerned that when your kids learn the other side of the story that you aren’t teaching them that they will believe that side???

I would think that most people would want children that are as educated as possible, regardless of the subject.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 01:23 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2444
Joined  2008-04-20
MsBoJangles - 03 July 2008 01:13 PM

ccrider - 03 July 2008 01:09 PM
Any Louisianian who wants his kids to have a religious education can send them to parochial schools; although if the parochial school is Roman Catholic, the kids will learn standard biology ("Darwinism") in science classes, since the RC Church — Gov. Jindal’s church — approves it. Or they can home school them. Everybody’s fine with this. I’m fine with it. Louisiana Coalition for Science is fine with it. Raise you kids the way you want to. You may not, though — you constitutionally may not oblige taxpayers to fund your religious beliefs.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjM2ODY1N2E1NGZkYTJiNDEyYWMyMWQzYTQzYWYxODU

No one is funding their religious beliefs, they are merely allowing the entire story to be taught. What, are you concerned that when your kids learn the other side of the story that you aren’t teaching them that they will believe that side???

I would think that most people would want children that are as educated as possible, regardless of the subject.

Just what book are they teaching from ?  I would not want anyone teaching any of this, if they are not spiritually lead.

 Signature 

McCain , The bad economy is just your imagination. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivroxPyG-IE&feature;=related

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 02:11 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2028
Joined  2007-08-17
MsBoJangles - 03 July 2008 01:13 PM

ccrider - 03 July 2008 01:09 PM
Any Louisianian who wants his kids to have a religious education can send them to parochial schools; although if the parochial school is Roman Catholic, the kids will learn standard biology ("Darwinism") in science classes, since the RC Church — Gov. Jindal’s church — approves it. Or they can home school them. Everybody’s fine with this. I’m fine with it. Louisiana Coalition for Science is fine with it. Raise you kids the way you want to. You may not, though — you constitutionally may not oblige taxpayers to fund your religious beliefs.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjM2ODY1N2E1NGZkYTJiNDEyYWMyMWQzYTQzYWYxODU

No one is funding their religious beliefs, they are merely allowing the entire story to be taught. What, are you concerned that when your kids learn the other side of the story that you aren’t teaching them that they will believe that side???

I would think that most people would want children that are as educated as possible, regardless of the subject.

That’s just it; the “entire story” you hope to see taught in science classes will inherently bring religion and religious beliefs into science class.  That’s unacceptable. 

Science should be taught in science class and the Hindi, Buddist, Judeo/Muslim/Christian, multiple Native American, Spagetti Monster, and African tribal creation mythologies should be taught in religion class(es).  I’m not afraid of my kids learning about evolutionary biology alongside a multifaith understanding of how various cultures postulate we were created by a higher power...so long as the science is taught in science class and the religion is taught in religion class.  Jindal’s crowning achievement this session won’t stand up to the legal challenge that is sure to follow, and rightfully so.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 02:18 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Regular Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  64
Joined  2008-07-01
MsBoJangles - 03 July 2008 01:13 PM

ccrider - 03 July 2008 01:09 PM
Any Louisianian who wants his kids to have a religious education can send them to parochial schools; although if the parochial school is Roman Catholic, the kids will learn standard biology ("Darwinism") in science classes, since the RC Church — Gov. Jindal’s church — approves it. Or they can home school them. Everybody’s fine with this. I’m fine with it. Louisiana Coalition for Science is fine with it. Raise you kids the way you want to. You may not, though — you constitutionally may not oblige taxpayers to fund your religious beliefs.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjM2ODY1N2E1NGZkYTJiNDEyYWMyMWQzYTQzYWYxODU

No one is funding their religious beliefs, they are merely allowing the entire story to be taught. What, are you concerned that when your kids learn the other side of the story that you aren’t teaching them that they will believe that side???

I would think that most people would want children that are as educated as possible, regardless of the subject.

There is no other side to the story. There are many other sides that various religions believe and even within Christianity there are multiple versions.

But there’s only one scientific version. Which ones of the others do you want to teach.

Teach the truth.

No other religion teaches the Biblical version. It is a religious belief. If you teach one of them, you should teach them all.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 02:22 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Regular Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  64
Joined  2008-07-01
DM1 - 03 July 2008 01:23 PM

MsBoJangles - 03 July 2008 01:13 PM
ccrider - 03 July 2008 01:09 PM
Any Louisianian who wants his kids to have a religious education can send them to parochial schools; although if the parochial school is Roman Catholic, the kids will learn standard biology ("Darwinism") in science classes, since the RC Church — Gov. Jindal’s church — approves it. Or they can home school them. Everybody’s fine with this. I’m fine with it. Louisiana Coalition for Science is fine with it. Raise you kids the way you want to. You may not, though — you constitutionally may not oblige taxpayers to fund your religious beliefs.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjM2ODY1N2E1NGZkYTJiNDEyYWMyMWQzYTQzYWYxODU

No one is funding their religious beliefs, they are merely allowing the entire story to be taught. What, are you concerned that when your kids learn the other side of the story that you aren’t teaching them that they will believe that side???

I would think that most people would want children that are as educated as possible, regardless of the subject.

Just what book are they teaching from ?  I would not want anyone teaching any of this, if they are not spiritually lead.

Who gets to decide on what spirituality is? Me? You? The Catholic Church? A Muslim? A Hindu? An atheist? The government? The legislators? Jindal?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 03:54 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Regular Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  232
Joined  2008-07-02

And I want the scientific facts of global warming taught also. After all, Al Gore and a host of respected scientists say it is a proven scientific fact! And Al Gore was VP of the US and has a Tony or Emmy or some kinda’ award to prove it.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 04:00 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Regular Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  64
Joined  2008-07-01
charlielake - 03 July 2008 03:54 PM

And I want the scientific facts of global warming taught also. After all, Al Gore and a host of respected scientists say it is a proven scientific fact! And Al Gore was VP of the US and has a Tony or Emmy or some kinda’ award to prove it.

To prove what? That he made a popular film?

Oscars are given for movies. Tonys are given for Broadway shows. I can’t see Gore performing on Broadway, can you?

Not that I disagree with him on global warming but only that a) he is not president because he could not carry his home state of Tennessee, b) he “misspoke” badly when he said he invented the Internet and c) he let George Bush beat him out.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 04:05 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3125
Joined  2003-10-08
Leon Trotsky - 03 July 2008 02:11 PM

Science should be taught in science class and the Hindi, Buddist, Judeo/Muslim/Christian, multiple Native American, Spagetti Monster, and African tribal creation mythologies should be taught in religion class(es).  I’m not afraid of my kids learning about evolutionary biology alongside a multifaith understanding of how various cultures postulate we were created by a higher power...so long as the science is taught in science class and the religion is taught in religion class.

Exactly.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 04:12 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7363
Joined  2006-09-21
ccrider - 03 July 2008 04:00 PM

Emmys are given for movies. Tonys are given for TV shows.

Movies, tv, Broadway

Oscars, Emmys, Tonys

 Signature 

Nope.  Don’t even think it.  Not the governor.  He has a job to do (God bless him and help keep him focused on governing and not on imposing his personal religious interpretations on the rest of us) while I’m just a moderate gadfly ... which in Louisiana they call “liberal.” --Faux Bobby Jindal

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 04:13 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Regular Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  64
Joined  2008-07-01
Bobby Jindal - 03 July 2008 04:12 PM

ccrider - 03 July 2008 04:00 PM

Emmys are given for movies. Tonys are given for TV shows.

Movies, tv, Broadway

Oscars, Emmys, Tonys

Thanks. I stand corrected on the matter.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2008 11:43 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2444
Joined  2008-04-20
ccrider - 03 July 2008 02:22 PM

DM1 - 03 July 2008 01:23 PM
MsBoJangles - 03 July 2008 01:13 PM
ccrider - 03 July 2008 01:09 PM
Any Louisianian who wants his kids to have a religious education can send them to parochial schools; although if the parochial school is Roman Catholic, the kids will learn standard biology ("Darwinism") in science classes, since the RC Church — Gov. Jindal’s church — approves it. Or they can home school them. Everybody’s fine with this. I’m fine with it. Louisiana Coalition for Science is fine with it. Raise you kids the way you want to. You may not, though — you constitutionally may not oblige taxpayers to fund your religious beliefs.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjM2ODY1N2E1NGZkYTJiNDEyYWMyMWQzYTQzYWYxODU

No one is funding their religious beliefs, they are merely allowing the entire story to be taught. What, are you concerned that when your kids learn the other side of the story that you aren’t teaching them that they will believe that side???

I would think that most people would want children that are as educated as possible, regardless of the subject.

Just what book are they teaching from ?  I would not want anyone teaching any of this, if they are not spiritually lead.

Who gets to decide on what spirituality is? Me? You? The Catholic Church? A Muslim? A Hindu? An atheist? The government? The legislators? Jindal?

You hit the nail on the head. No one should be able to decide what is spirituality for another person so that voids this being taught in school. If they are going to try
and teach history they should teach from the Torah which was wrote by the Jewish people. In writing the king James bible many of the Hebrew words were translated
badly and sometimes they change the whole meaning of what was really being said.
I would not want our kids being taught the Torah as Law because it is the old testament and yet the new testament is really tied into the history of the old.
Now if you are a true Jewish believer, you do not believe in the new testament.

So how can Jindal and friends decided what to teach and how to teach it ? I think if they do this, we will only see the ACLU become involved in this and
in the long run christian kids will lose more of their rights.

 Signature 

McCain , The bad economy is just your imagination. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivroxPyG-IE&feature;=related

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 July 2008 11:22 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]
Regular Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  157
Joined  2008-06-29
DM1 - 03 July 2008 11:43 PM

ccrider - 03 July 2008 02:22 PM
DM1 - 03 July 2008 01:23 PM
MsBoJangles - 03 July 2008 01:13 PM
ccrider - 03 July 2008 01:09 PM
Any Louisianian who wants his kids to have a religious education can send them to parochial schools; although if the parochial school is Roman Catholic, the kids will learn standard biology ("Darwinism") in science classes, since the RC Church — Gov. Jindal’s church — approves it. Or they can home school them. Everybody’s fine with this. I’m fine with it. Louisiana Coalition for Science is fine with it. Raise you kids the way you want to. You may not, though — you constitutionally may not oblige taxpayers to fund your religious beliefs.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjM2ODY1N2E1NGZkYTJiNDEyYWMyMWQzYTQzYWYxODU

No one is funding their religious beliefs, they are merely allowing the entire story to be taught. What, are you concerned that when your kids learn the other side of the story that you aren’t teaching them that they will believe that side???

I would think that most people would want children that are as educated as possible, regardless of the subject.

Just what book are they teaching from ?  I would not want anyone teaching any of this, if they are not spiritually lead.

Who gets to decide on what spirituality is? Me? You? The Catholic Church? A Muslim? A Hindu? An atheist? The government? The legislators? Jindal?

You hit the nail on the head. No one should be able to decide what is spirituality for another person so that voids this being taught in school. If they are going to try
and teach history they should teach from the Torah which was wrote by the Jewish people. In writing the king James bible many of the Hebrew words were translated
badly and sometimes they change the whole meaning of what was really being said.
I would not want our kids being taught the Torah as Law because it is the old testament and yet the new testament is really tied into the history of the old.
Now if you are a true Jewish believer, you do not believe in the new testament.

So how can Jindal and friends decided what to teach and how to teach it ? I think if they do this, we will only see the ACLU become involved in this and
in the long run christian kids will lose more of their rights.

I do so hope the ACLU steps in on this issue.  Since they have stepped into the case of Steve Theriot telling his staff that they can not vote in a recall, I
believe they take up this issue. 

Seems like the protection of liberty if being forgotton on many things.  Now they use it as a way to take it away from us.

 Signature 

"Public offices were not made for private convenience.” --Thomas Jefferson

Profile