John Edwards talked about “morals” often when campaigning has been forced finally admitted national inquirer was right ..he carried on an affair and possibly fathered a child while his wife has CANCER…
Main stream media (exception 0f fair and balanced Fox) has totally ignored it , as they often cover for the Whiner’s Party(D.),but now are forced to remove their cover-up ....

I am sick and tired of the Dims--everytime a Rep. has a problem(vitter,stephens,etc) ACTING ALL High AND MIGHTY and looking down their holier- than- thou elitist noses at us…

I repeat for 15th time...NO PARTY has moral highground....

Given victims’ success in suing National Enquirer for false reporting, how would you decide whether to carry or follow up on one of their stories?  Would you have published or followed up on a “Geo W. B. is still drinking” story from them??

Bobby Jindal - 08 August 2008 03:25 PM

Given victims’ success in suing National Enquirer for false reporting, how would you decide whether to carry or follow up on one of their stories?  Would you have published or followed up on a “Geo W. B. is still drinking” story from them??

Just because the enquirer reported it first, booby is still peeved....

Bobby is curious, and nobody wants to answer his question.  How do you decide which Enquirer stories to spread around and which to ignore?  They surely have broken some true stories, but they also have a string of false stories resulting in liability.  What’s your standard?

Bobby Jindal - 08 August 2008 03:25 PM

Given victims’ success in suing National Enquirer for false reporting, how would you decide whether to carry or follow up on one of their stories?  Would you have published or followed up on a “Geo W. B. is still drinking” story from them??

there was no smoking gun that Bush was drinking again and NO ONE FILED SUIT over it like the Nat. Enquirers’ reporters who were kicked out of hotel after catching him leaving room did. Edwards ran back up stairs and hid in a men’s bathroom for 15 minutes till security guards ushered reporters out AND they were hotel guests....
I know you have to be very careful with national enquirer..but there was a hell of alot of smoke here and CNN,ABC,Etc. DID NOT even try to find out if it was true…
also, it was The Globe who said W. was drinking again and they are ones who showed picture on cover of alien visiting with W, and clinton...lol

but, who cares ?? they MSM have already anointed Obama as next Prez !

Bobby Jindal - 08 August 2008 03:54 PM

Bobby is curious, and nobody wants to answer his question.  How do you decide which Enquirer stories to spread around and which to ignore?  They surely have broken some true stories, but they also have a string of false stories resulting in liability.  What’s your standard?

Easy booby.. I’ll tell you.

bottom line - 08 August 2008 03:57 PM

Bobby Jindal - 08 August 2008 03:25 PM

Given victims’ success in suing National Enquirer for false reporting, how would you decide whether to carry or follow up on one of their stories?  Would you have published or followed up on a “Geo W. B. is still drinking” story from them??

there was no smoking gun that Bush was drinking again and NO ONE FILED SUIT over it like the Nat. Enquirers’ reporters who were kicked out of hotel after catching him leaving room did. Edwards ran back up stairs and hid in a men’s bathroom for 15 minutes till security guards ushered reporters out AND they were hotel guests....
I know you have to be very careful with national enquirer..but there was a hell of alot of smoke here and CNN,ABC,Etc. DID NOT even try to find out if it was true…
also, it was The Globe who said W. was drinking again and they are ones who showed picture on cover of alien visiting with W, and clinton...lol

but, who cares ?? they MSM have already anointed Obama as next Prez !

such a double standard with way press handles it when it’s one of their fav’s....

Article on Ted Stevens mentions 7 times he was a Rep.

same day article on D. mayor on Detroit--there is NO mention in article or is word D. mentioned.....

bottom line - 11 August 2008 10:11 PM

such a double standard with way press handles it when it’s one of their fav’s....

Article on Ted Stevens mentions 7 times he was a Rep.

same day article on D. mayor on Detroit--there is NO mention in article or is word D. mentioned.....

Hmm, black mayor of Detroit.  Yea, he might be a republican, better clarify that for our readers.

fred - 08 August 2008 03:35 PM

Bobby Jindal - 08 August 2008 03:25 PM

Given victims’ success in suing National Enquirer for false reporting, how would you decide whether to carry or follow up on one of their stories?  Would you have published or followed up on a “Geo W. B. is still drinking” story from them??

Just because the enquirer reported it first, booby is still peeved....

No. The National Enquirer can print any old grainy photo and make claims about public figures, as with Mrs. McCain supposedly practicing desert lizard tongue techniques with some elderly Moody Blues fan.  Does that mean the mainstream media should jump all over it?  I don’t think so.  It’s terrible.

Bobby Jindal - 12 November 2008 01:14 PM

fred - 08 August 2008 03:35 PM

Bobby Jindal - 08 August 2008 03:25 PM

Given victims’ success in suing National Enquirer for false reporting, how would you decide whether to carry or follow up on one of their stories?  Would you have published or followed up on a “Geo W. B. is still drinking” story from them??

Just because the enquirer reported it first, booby is still peeved....

No. The National Enquirer can print any old grainy photo and make claims about public figures, as with Mrs. McCain supposedly practicing desert lizard tongue techniques with some elderly Moody Blues fan.  Does that mean the mainstream media should jump all over it?  I don’t think so.  It’s terrible.

LMAO.  That’s karma for the old fart who never could keep his weenie in his pants.

How could you say such an awful thing?  This story is an invasion of privacy.  It’s not like the McCains were elected President and First Lady or anything.  Shame.