Wall Street Journal: “Record Contradicts Palin’s ‘Bridge’ Claims”
Posted: 09 September 2008 08:40 AM   [ Ignore ]
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7425
Joined  2006-09-21

Gov. Palin’s claim comes with a serious caveat. She endorsed the multimillion dollar project during her gubernatorial race in 2006. And while she did take part in stopping the project after it became a national scandal, she did not return the federal money. She just allocated it elsewhere.

“We need to come to the defense of Southeast Alaska when proposals are on the table like the bridge,” Gov. Palin said in August 2006, according to the local newspaper, “and not allow the spinmeisters to turn this project or any other into something that’s so negative.” The bridge would have linked Ketchikan to the airport on Gravina Island. Travelers from Ketchikan (pop. 7,500) now rely on ferries.

A year ago, the governor issued a press release that the money for the project was being “redirected.”

“Ketchikan desires a better way to reach the airport, but the $398 million bridge is not the answer,” she said. ”Despite the work of our congressional delegation, we are about $329 million short of full funding for the bridge project, and it’s clear that Congress has little interest in spending any more money on a bridge between Ketchikan and Gravina Island. Much of the public’s attitude toward Alaska bridges is based on inaccurate portrayals of the projects here. But we need to focus on what we can do, rather than fight over what has happened.”

=============

....The McCain campaign jumped back with spokesman Brian Rogers calling the attacks “hysterical.”

“The only people ‘lying’ about spending are the Obama campaign. The only explanation for their hysterical attacks is that they’re afraid that when John McCain and Sarah Palin are in the White House, Barack Obama’s nearly $1 billion in earmark spending will stop dead in its tracks,” Mr. Rogers said.

At a rally today, Sen. McCain again asserted that Sen. Obama has requested nearly a billion in earmarks. In fact, the Illinois senator requested $311 million last year, according to the Associated Press, and none this year. In comparison, Gov. Palin has requested $750 million in her two years as governor—which the AP says is the largest per-capita request in the nation

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122090791901411709.html

 Signature 

Nope.  Don’t even think it.  Not the governor.  He has a job to do (God bless him and help keep him focused on governing and not on imposing his personal religious interpretations on the rest of us) while I’m just a moderate gadfly ... which in Louisiana they call “liberal.” --Faux Bobby Jindal

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 September 2008 08:50 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6072
Joined  2007-07-26

Does this mean a politician actually exaggerated their involvement in something?

 Signature 

“How small of all that human hearts endure / That part which laws or kings can cause or cure.” Samuel Johnson

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 September 2008 08:57 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  23436
Joined  2004-10-21

FARMINGTON HILLS, Michigan (AFP) – Barack Obama ripped into John McCain and Sarah Palin as never before Monday, accusing his Republican White House foes of “shameless” dishonesty with their claim to be “mavericks” ready to shake up Washington.

http://news.yahoo.com/story//afp/20080908/ts_afp/usvote_080908234500

Wow, harsh words from a man who picks Joe Biden as his running mate.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 September 2008 08:59 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7425
Joined  2006-09-21
I. B. Freeman - 09 September 2008 08:50 AM

Does this mean a politician actually exaggerated their involvement in something?

It means her one claim to fame is a lie.

See further, tax cutter Buddy Jindal!!

 Signature 

Nope.  Don’t even think it.  Not the governor.  He has a job to do (God bless him and help keep him focused on governing and not on imposing his personal religious interpretations on the rest of us) while I’m just a moderate gadfly ... which in Louisiana they call “liberal.” --Faux Bobby Jindal

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 September 2008 09:30 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  23436
Joined  2004-10-21
Bobby Jindal - 09 September 2008 08:59 AM

I. B. Freeman - 09 September 2008 08:50 AM
Does this mean a politician actually exaggerated their involvement in something?

It means her one claim to fame is a lie.

See further, tax cutter Buddy Jindal!!

Her one claim to fame??  My, you’re reading out of obama’s playbook again, aren’t you??  LOL

Profile