2 of 2
2
What Happened to “Global Warming”
Posted: 13 November 2008 06:33 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 16 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  23436
Joined  2004-10-21
Bobby Jindal - 13 November 2008 06:32 PM

fred - 13 November 2008 06:06 PM
And no where in the article does it say “global warming” is man made.  Your article supports what I’ve said.. 

Roux’ article says fossil burning fuel and deforestation cause warming.  The whole point of it is that today’s man-made warming could have an effect on the climate thousands of years from now.

No, it talks of wild climatic swings, long before man was here.

Geologists turned up evidence that the past few million years, during which the ice sheets cycled back and forth, was an unusual time in the Earth’s history.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 13 November 2008 06:39 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 17 ]
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7425
Joined  2006-09-21

Fred, you apparently are not capable of reading and understanding the entire article, much less a scientific paper on the topic.  Picking out a phrase here and there and thinking it reinforces your whole politico-theological doctrine on the inability of man to affect natural history is laughable.  It is, however, the way your thought process works, both with science and with politics.  That’s a pity.

 Signature 

Nope.  Don’t even think it.  Not the governor.  He has a job to do (God bless him and help keep him focused on governing and not on imposing his personal religious interpretations on the rest of us) while I’m just a moderate gadfly ... which in Louisiana they call “liberal.” --Faux Bobby Jindal

Profile
 
 
Posted: 13 November 2008 06:42 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 18 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  23436
Joined  2004-10-21

I understand. I also understand their study goes back only to the pleistocene age.. Other studies go back much further, even to the Permian.. These guys do postulate that they think mans addition of gasses could be a factor, but even they are not sure.  So no smoking gun boooby.. And this won’t completely support your political agenda on climate.

The pity is I read the whole article.. Actually pretty good.. But you read it through politically shaded glasses. I don’t.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 November 2008 11:22 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 19 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  9235
Joined  2005-10-19

Hottest October was actually September....

GISS’s computerised temperature maps seemed to show readings across a large part of Russia had been up to 10 degrees higher than normal. But when expert readers of the two leading warming-sceptic blogs, Watts Up With That and Climate Audit, began detailed analysis of the GISS data they made an astonishing discovery. The reason for the freak figures was that scores of temperature records from Russia and elsewhere were not based on October readings at all. Figures from the previous month had simply been carried over and repeated two months running.

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/16/hottest-october-on-record-was-really-a-september/

 Signature 

If you are part of a society that votes, then do so. There may be no candidates and no measures you want to vote for . . but there are certain to be ones you want to vote against. In case of doubt, vote against. By this rule you will rarely go wrong. - Robert Heinlein

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 November 2008 08:49 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 20 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  23436
Joined  2004-10-21

A surreal scientific blunder last week raised a huge question mark about the temperature records that underpin the worldwide alarm over global warming. On Monday, Nasa’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), which is run by Al Gore’s chief scientific ally, Dr James Hansen, and is one of four bodies responsible for monitoring global temperatures, announced that last month was the hottest October on record.

So what explained the anomaly? GISS’s computerised temperature maps seemed to show readings across a large part of Russia had been up to 10 degrees higher than normal. But when expert readers of the two leading warming-sceptic blogs, Watts Up With That and Climate Audit, began detailed analysis of the GISS data they made an astonishing discovery. The reason for the freak figures was that scores of temperature records from Russia and elsewhere were not based on October readings at all. Figures from the previous month had simply been carried over and repeated two months running.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/11/16/do1610.xml

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 November 2008 09:08 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 21 ]
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7425
Joined  2006-09-21

The other thread on this has the link to the NASA study which adjusts for the minor error.  Look, here it is in this thread too!!

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2007/

 Signature 

Nope.  Don’t even think it.  Not the governor.  He has a job to do (God bless him and help keep him focused on governing and not on imposing his personal religious interpretations on the rest of us) while I’m just a moderate gadfly ... which in Louisiana they call “liberal.” --Faux Bobby Jindal

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 November 2008 09:27 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 22 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  23436
Joined  2004-10-21

It was no minor error booooby.  There’s a schitload of conflicting data out there.. Anyone who claims to have the definitive answser (Al Gore) is full of krap.. Global cooling actually presents a far more danger to society than does global warming.  I beleive these swings are normal, and man’s influence on them is minimal at best..

Now is the time for President Bush to bring the debate on global warming out into the open by firing James Hansen of GISS. There certainly is cause for firing him. And since the GISS data has been the primary data source for the global warming alarmists, publicizing the unreliability of their data is crucial to defeating carbon taxes.

It’s not the first time, either that his “records” fail any test of accuracy and that he’s tap danced away from any notion of being accountable for his errors.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 November 2008 11:57 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 23 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  9235
Joined  2005-10-19

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitalweathergang/2008/11/nbc_fires_twc_environmental_un.html

 Signature 

If you are part of a society that votes, then do so. There may be no candidates and no measures you want to vote for . . but there are certain to be ones you want to vote against. In case of doubt, vote against. By this rule you will rarely go wrong. - Robert Heinlein

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 November 2008 07:26 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 24 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2803
Joined  2008-03-10
roux - 23 November 2008 11:57 AM

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitalweathergang/2008/11/nbc_fires_twc_environmental_un.html

Do I think that this has more to do with the recession, than it has to do with a change in thinking concerning Global Warming?

 Signature 

"Make a Change Today, for a Better Tomorrow!”

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 November 2008 05:20 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 25 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  9235
Joined  2005-10-19

Climate change skeptics on Capitol Hill are quietly watching a growing accumulation of global cooling science and other findings that could signal that the science behind global warming may still be too shaky to warrant cap-and-trade legislation.

While the new Obama administration promises aggressive, forward-thinking environmental policies, Weather Channel co-founder Joseph D’Aleo and other scientists are organizing lobbying efforts to take aim at the cap-and-trade bill that Democrats plan to unveil in January.

So far, members of Congress have not been keen to publicly back the global cooling theory. But both senators from Oklahoma, Republicans Tom Coburn and Jim Inhofe, have often expressed doubts about how much of a role man-made emissions play.

http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=D0C4924D-18FE-70B2-A808D77A9C1FFFD3

 Signature 

If you are part of a society that votes, then do so. There may be no candidates and no measures you want to vote for . . but there are certain to be ones you want to vote against. In case of doubt, vote against. By this rule you will rarely go wrong. - Robert Heinlein

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 November 2008 12:32 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 26 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2915
Joined  2007-08-19

I read where The Weather Channel “green team” got cut. I guess the climate change scare is BS after all.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 08 December 2008 10:40 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 27 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  9235
Joined  2005-10-19

I guess since Obama has mounted his Unicorn and solved all problems it’s over…

I recently asked whether the world is poised to enter an Obama-style “trance” on climate policy given the focus on economic turmoil and plunge in oil prices, which have in the past seemed synchronized with concerns about transforming energy policy. (Keep in mind that the chief executive officer of Gulf Oil said Wednesday that oil could drop to $20 a barrel and gasoline $1 a gallon).

http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/05/back-to-media-trance-on-climate/?ref=science

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mopkn0lPzM8

 Signature 

If you are part of a society that votes, then do so. There may be no candidates and no measures you want to vote for . . but there are certain to be ones you want to vote against. In case of doubt, vote against. By this rule you will rarely go wrong. - Robert Heinlein

Profile
 
 
Posted: 18 December 2008 07:59 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 28 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  23436
Joined  2004-10-21

A rare winter storm swept through Southern Nevada Wednesday, dumping the most snow on the valley in nearly three decades, grounding flights at the airport, forcing the closure of major highways and closing schools for today.

“This is the most snow we’ve had in Las Vegas in almost 30 years,” said Chris Stachelski, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service. “It’s a significant historical event.”

http://www.lvrj.com/news/36335684.html

And to quote that reporter who’s name I can’t remember, “all this extremely cold freezing weather proves we are experiencing “global warming”..  Yea, and my conservative republican posts PROVES I am a liberal dimocrat!!!  tongue wink

Profile
 
 
Posted: 18 December 2008 08:45 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 29 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  23436
Joined  2004-10-21

Not that I’m pushing the issue, but:

http://www.accuweather.com/news-top-headline.asp?partner=accuweather&traveler;=0&date;=2008-12-18_21:45

http://www.lasvegasnow.com/global/story.asp?s=9533950

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008535259_webspokane18m.html

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid;=aa.Pb5bDzQOc&refer;=worldwide

http://cbs2chicago.com/local/snowstorm.one.foot.2.890158.html

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,469164,00.html

That dang global warming is freezing them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  LOL

Profile
 
 
   
2 of 2
2