Avman - 03 November 2008 11:56 AM
maurepas1 - 02 November 2008 10:30 PM
Trollfessor - 02 November 2008 10:22 PM
maurepas1 - 02 November 2008 07:49 PM
All eyes will be on the Ethics Board to see if it goes after any individual who was appointed to a state board who it was later discovered made a contribution to the office holder who appointed that individual to that position.
Is that unlawful? If someone donates to Jindal’s campaign, then Jindal can’t appoint that person to a position? I didn’t realize that was the law, do you happen to have the citation for that?
Maybe such practices were legal during the Edwards Era, but today, with the emphasis on ethics, how could it not be unethical? Are we so screwed up that we can’t even see the problem with such behavior?
Maurepas, is it ethical for candidates to hire people who worked on their campaigns whether paid or volunteer service? People who have money tend to be more qualified and also tend to agree with candidates on issues. It’s unethical if it’s quid pro quo, that the services or money was on condition. That being said, it seems to me that this would end up in thought policing.
All candidates have a tendency to help the people who helped them, it’s human nature, it’s responsible politics, and provides stability in our nation. Could you imagine what it would be like if candidates couldn’t hire their supporters? That they actually sought out people that worked against them? There’d be far more scandals than we currently have.
What you are forgetting is that only a tiny fraction of the voting public ever contributes to a campaign. You are assuming that the only qualified people to sit on boards or commissions are those who make significant contributions to campaigns. This clearly isn’t the case.